About the Author

  • Peter Sim

    Peter has acted in a wide range of civil litigation matters including commercial law, construction disputes, personal injury, insolvency and wrongful dismissal.

    pas@tdslaw.com
    (204) 934-2565

The Manitoba Legislature is considering a bill to consolidate the regulation of various types of equipment. The Technical Safety Act will replace a series of equipment-specific statutes with a single regulatory framework. The Act creates the office of a director of technical safety with broad powers of administration and enforcement. Penalties for violations will be significantly increased. The Bill has received second reading and is proceeding through the committee stage.

The Technical Safety Act will replace The Electricians’ Licence Act, The Elevator Act, The Gas and Oil Burner Act, The Power Engineers Act, The Steam and Pressure Plants Act and Part II of The Amusements Act.

The new Act will apply to amusement rides; boilers and boiler systems; pressure vessels and pressure piping systems; electrical products and electrical devices; elevators and escalators; fuel burning equipment and fuel systems; refrigeration equipment and refrigeration systems; and any other work or equipment prescribed by regulation as regulated equipment or regulated work.

The Act provides that regulated equipment must not be installed or operated without a permit. Anyone performing regulated work on regulated equipment will have to have a licence.

If required by regulation or by written order of the director of technical safety, every owner, manufacturer, vendor or designer of regulated equipment and every person who does regulated work on regulated equipment will have to establish a quality assurance program and obtain a certificate of approval for the program from the director.

The director will have the power to issue, revoke and suspend the various licences, permits and certificates required under the Act.

The director will also have the power to issue an order to require that regulated equipment or regulated work comply with a higher standard than that prescribed under the Act if the director believes that the higher standard is necessary to minimize a technical safety risk. The Act defines a technical safety risk as “a risk that serious personal injury, death or property damage could be caused by the use of regulated equipment or the performance of regulated work”.

Decisions of the director may be appealed to a Technical Safety Appeal Board appointed by the minister responsible for the Act. The appeal board is to consist of three to five members who are knowledgeable on safety matters relating to regulated equipment or regulated work.

The Act provides for the appointment of inspectors with the power to inspect regulated equipment and records relating to regulated equipment. Inspectors have the power to issue stop work orders where there are reasonable grounds to believe that equipment or work on equipment violates the Act or regulations, or regulated equipment or work poses a technical safety risk.

The director may impose administrative penalties of up to $5,000 for violations of the Act or orders under the Act. An administrative penalty may be appealed to the Court of Queen’s Bench. Once an administrative penalty is paid for a contravention, the person who paid the penalty may not be prosecuted for the same contravention unless the contravention continues after the penalty is paid.

On a prosecution for a contravention of the Act, the penalty for an individual found guilty of an offence is a fine of not more than $125,000 or imprisonment for a term of not more than six months, or both, for a first offence. For a second or subsequent offence by an individual, the maximum fine is increased to $250,000. The maximum fine for a corporation is $250,000 for a first offence, and $500,000 for a second or subsequent offence.

Once the new Act is in place, a regulation will provide for the continuance or transition of licences and permits issued under the various equipment-specific statutes that are being repealed.


DISCLAIMER:
This article is presented for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute legal advice or solicitation and does not create a solicitor client relationship. The views expressed are solely the authors’ and should not be attributed to any other party, including Thompson Dorfman Sweatman LLP (TDS), its affiliate companies or its clients. The authors make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to via this article. The authors are not able to provide free legal advice. If you are seeking advice on specific matters, please contact Keith LaBossiere, CEO & Managing Partner at kdl@tdslaw.com, or 204.934.2587. Please be aware that any unsolicited information sent to the author(s) cannot be considered to be solicitor-client privileged.

While care is taken to ensure the accuracy for the purposes stated, before relying upon these articles, you should seek and be guided by legal advice based on your specific circumstances. We would be pleased to provide you with our assistance on any of the issues raised in these articles.