May 25, 2012

About the Author

  • Peter Sim

    Peter has acted in a wide range of civil litigation matters including commercial law, construction disputes, personal injury, insolvency and wrongful dismissal.
    (204) 934-2565

Amendments to the Human Rights Code to expand the grounds of discrimination and streamline complaint procedures have been introduced in the Manitoba legislature.

The prohibited grounds of discrimination are being expanded to include gender identity and social disadvantage.

Social disadvantage is defined as

“diminished social standing or social regard due to

(a) homelessness or inadequate housing;
(b) low levels of education;
(c) chronic low income; or
(d) chronic unemployment or underemployment.”

However, discrimination on this basis will only exist where is proved that the discrimination is based on a “negative bias or stereotype” related to social disadvantage.

Gender identity is not defined in the Code but commentary on the bill states that it refers to transgender persons.

The Code currently contains a definition of “dog guide” which covers dogs trained to assist visually impaired persons. This definition is being replaced with “service animal” which covers any animal which has been trained to assist a person with any type of disability.

Complaints may now be considered by panels consisting of three or more members of the commission rather than the commission as a whole.

The Commission will be given the power to combine complaints dealing with similar issues of facts and law and to request that they be dealt with together at a single hearing.

The Minister of Justice will no longer be responsible for designating adjudicators to conduct hearings. Instead, a member of the adjudication panel will be appointed Chief Adjudicator and given the power to supervise the hearing process. However, the Minister will still be able to intervene if the Chief Adjudicator fails to act.

The power of the Commission to promote settlement of complaints has been expanded. The Commission may now attempt to resolve a complaint through mediation or conciliation at any time during the complaint process. Where a complainant rejects an offer of settlement by the respondent which the Commission or the Adjudicator considers to be reasonable, the complaint must be terminated.

This article is presented for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute legal advice or solicitation and does not create a solicitor client relationship. The views expressed are solely the authors’ and should not be attributed to any other party, including Thompson Dorfman Sweatman LLP (TDS), its affiliate companies or its clients. The authors make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to via this article. The authors are not able to provide free legal advice. If you are seeking advice on specific matters, please contact Keith LaBossiere, CEO & Managing Partner at, or 204.934.2587. Please be aware that any unsolicited information sent to the author(s) cannot be considered to be solicitor-client privileged.

While care is taken to ensure the accuracy for the purposes stated, before relying upon these articles, you should seek and be guided by legal advice based on your specific circumstances. We would be pleased to provide you with our assistance on any of the issues raised in these articles.